Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 05:41

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Stock Market News, June 3, 2025: Nasdaq Moves Higher; OECD Cuts U.S. Growth Outlook - WSJ
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Have you ever been physically attacked by a demon?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Google can now generate a fake AI podcast of your search results - Ars Technica
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What are the biggest challenges in training multimodal AI models?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Fantasy Baseball SP Roundup 6/12: Nobody Beats Jay Mis - Pitcher List
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
iFixit says the Switch 2 is even harder to repair than the original - The Verge
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Enhanced Box Score: Phillies 4, Cubs 3 – June 9, 2025 - Bleacher Nation
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
How does Taylor Swift make sure that she doesn’t show her uterus to her audience and fans?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What is your opinion on the band Nickelback? Why do they receive criticism from some people?